tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-81468112024-03-07T01:14:02.704-05:00InsideGoogleNathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.comBlogger725125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1104019983218846522004-12-25T19:11:00.000-05:002005-12-13T16:49:16.876-05:00We've Moved!<div align=Left><font size="+1"><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/">InsideGoogle</a></font>
<br />now at <a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/">google.blognewschannel.com</a>
<br />or <a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/">google.blognc.com</a>, if you're lazy
<br />
<br /><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/feed/rss2/">RSS 2.0</a>   <a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/comments/feed/rss2/">Comments RSS 2.0</a></div><div align=Right><font size="+1"><a href="http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/">InsideMicrosoft</a></font>
<br />now at <a href="http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/">microsoft.blognewschannel.com</a>
<br />or <a href="http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/">microsoft.blognc.com</a>, if you're lazy
<br /><a href="http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/feed/rss2/">RSS 2.0</a>   <a href="http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/comments/feed/rss2/">Comments RSS 2.0</a></div>
<br />
<br /><a href="http://www.blognewschannel.com/"><img src="http://www.blognewschannel.com/images/site/bnc-logo-50-big-text.jpg" align=Right></a>That's it. My blogs have now moved to my own site and dedicated hosting. Only its more than just dedicated hosting. I put out the call not long ago for some good people, and I'm gathering together some very talented bloggers and net programmers to create the next thing in blogging, a blog news organization. We want to create a network of blogs that works together to create a news site, but without all the crap of traditional media (and I should know, I work for the bad guys as well). The Blog News Channel aims to be the first news organization to provide personal news, written by real people who you'll get to know, each covering a beat obsessively like any good blogger. Everything you liked about blogs, all in one place, arranged and organized in one place.
<br />
<br />For now, we're still building the interface that makes it all tick, but four blogs are already up and running for you to digest. <a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/">InsideGoogle</a> and <a href="http://microsoft.blognewschannel.com/">InsideMicrosoft</a> retain exactly the same obsessive focus that brought you here in the first place. <a href="http://business.blognewschannel.com/">BusinessBits</a> (<a href="http://business.blognewschannel.com/feed/rss2/">RSS 2.0</a> / <a href="http://business.blognewschannel.com/comments/feed/rss2/">Comments RSS 2.0</a>) written by Devin Reams, a business major at the University of Colorado at Boulder, will have a focus on corporate moves and the stock market (stay away from Google and Microsoft!). Finally, <a href="http://politics.blognewschannel.com/">The Society Junta</a> (<a href="http://politics.blognewschannel.com/feed/rss2/">RSS 2.0</a> / <a href="http://politics.blognewschannel.com/comments/feed/rss2/">Comments RSS 2.0</a>)is our look at politics, from "BFranklin", a longtime political blogger and insider. You can also go to our <a href="http://opensource.blognewschannel.com/">Open Source</a> (<a href="http://opensource.blognewschannel.com/feed/rss2/">RSS 2.0</a> / <a href="http://opensource.blognewschannel.com/comments/feed/rss2/">Comments RSS 2.0</a>) blog, where Amit Agarwal will soon begin blogging about the open source movement and all those subversive computer movement like Linux and Firefox (think of it as the anti-InsideMicrosoft). Coming blogs will focus on independent films, Apple Computers, and Gadgets, plus I'm still recruiting bloggers for other subjects (if you're able, email me at <a href="mailto:random12345@gmail.com">random12345@gmail.com</a>).
<br />
<br />I think this can be the start of something special and new. If you'd like to be a part of it, <a href="mailto:random12345@gmail.com">let me know</a>. I've got ambitious plans for <a href="http://www.blognewschannel.com/">www.blognewschannel.com/</a> (for now it just says hi, but bookmark it, because its going to get real interesting), and I'll need good people to lend a talented hand. Everybody, make the trek over there, because this post is the last one you'll see either at BlogSpot or LiveJournal, so I'll need you to change your bookmarks and RSS. I want to know what everyone thinks, so email and comment your butts off. Let's welcome the New Year with the Blog News Channel!
<br />
<br /><a href="http://www.blognewschannel.com/"><img src="http://www.blognewschannel.com/images/site/bnc-logo-200-text.jpg"></a>
<br />
<br />Postscript - I'd also like to give a major shoutout to <a href="http://geek.isblogging.com/">Ma</a><a href="http://matt.isblogging.com/">tt</a> from LSBlog, who has given me an enormous amount of assistance. Without his help, this would have taken weeks, instead of six days. Check out <a href="http://lsblog.com/">his blogging software, LSBlog, at lsblog.com</a>. It has some major advanced features you wish your blogging software offered, and is definitely worth it.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103924060031277582004-12-24T16:33:00.000-05:002004-12-24T16:34:20.033-05:00Happy Holidays<img src="http://www.sisters2.com/fireplace.jpg" width=200 align=Right>I 'd like to wish a merry Christmas to all those who celebrate it, and happy holidays to everybody else, or at least happy vacation. Whether or not this is a special time of the year for you, use it as the opportunity it is and spend time with your loved ones. I've been to far too many sad occasions these last few months and trust me, you never know when you'll get another chance. Please, party, talk, and just sit around, but make the most of it.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103916985079763592004-12-24T14:34:00.000-05:002004-12-24T14:36:25.080-05:00Google Suggests Guts Disassembled - Part 2<a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/24/1432254&from=rss">Slashdot introduces us</a> to <a href="http://bayardo.youserv.net/Google_Suggest/Analysis.html">this analysis of Google Suggest</a>, which goes even deeper than <a href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/18/0139249&tid=217">previous dissections</a> of the Google Suggest engine. Some of the interesting discoveries:<ul>A simple program which finds all possible suggestions for any given starting term.
<br />Google Suggest ignores quotes.
<br />Order is more important than the actual terms.
<br />The number of suggestions is actually smaller than expected, making it possible for someone to implement Google Suggest on their own server, even implementing the whole thing in RAM (its that small).</ul>The most startling thing is that Google Suggest is actually based more on searches than results. To explain: Google Suggest returns results that are not in Google's index, or for terms that Google can never get to, because it indexes searches made as well as searches found. What does this mean? If you have typed a UPS tracking number into Google (something typical, because Google has searches for tracking numbers built it), it can find its way into Google Suggest. <a href="http://labs.google.com/suggest">Just go there</a> and type in "1ze" and watch the numbers pop up (all from packages delivered in the last six weeks). Does this mean credit card numbers could be in there as well? Less likely, but possible. Ironically, if you've ever searched for your credit card number to make sure it wasn't publicly available, you may have inadverantly added it to Google Suggest. Oy.
<br />
<br />Related posts:
<br /><strong><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/10/google-suggest/">Google Suggest</a></strong> - 12/10
<br /><strong><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/10/google-suggests-goooooooooooooooogle/">Google Suggests Goooooooooooooooogle</a></strong> - 12/10
<br /><strong><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/11/google-suggest-tools/">Google Suggest Tools</a></strong> - 12/11
<br /><strong><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/15/the-google-suggest-complete-my-sentence-game/">The Google Suggest Complete My Sentence Game</a></strong> - 12/15
<br /><strong><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/18/google-suggests-guts-disassembled/">Google Suggests Guts Disassembled</a></strong> - 12/18
<br /><strong><a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/20/google-suggest-poetry-generator/">Google Suggest Poetry Generator</a></strong> - 12/20
<br />Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103913340935002682004-12-24T13:34:00.000-05:002004-12-24T13:35:40.936-05:00Googlers Grateful For Free Grubs<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/12/24/PNG80AF8TJ1.DTL">The San Francisco Chronicle has an article</a> about Google's cafeteria, which provides 4,000 free meals for hungry Googlers all day. Apparently, 85% of the food is "healthy", like wheatgrass, grass-fed Angus beef, and all other sorts of organics. Hmm... I wonder if they also provide ethnic and religious foods, like a kosher or halal cafe?
<br />
<br />Anyway, from what I've been told, Googlers like the food, but not as much as they like that its free. Some Google employees have been known to never purchase groceries anymore, getting three squares a day at the Googleplex, and making up for non-working days by eating out and ordering in. Come to Google at lunch, and don't be surprised if a large number of people who are eating there are not Google employees at all, but their family, guests, and business partners. Plenty of people who have access to the cafeteria, take advantage of it for the free food.
<br />
<br />Well, good for them. I would too. Who doesn't want a well-prepared entirely free meal? Do you have any idea what it costs me to eat in Manhattan?
<br />
<br />Hmm... Does Google's New York office have a cafeteria?Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103878508206799502004-12-24T03:54:00.000-05:002006-08-21T23:38:21.876-04:00Google Doodle IX.5<img alt="Google Doodle IX.5" src="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_o.gif" />
<br />
<br />What the---? So the water both froze the logo <i>and</i> turned the snowballs into snowcones? Are there normally rabbits in the arctic? Are they selling the snowcones, that they made for free? I know you guys are confused, because the last post got a bunch of comments. Does this new Doodle confirm or inspire any new wackjob theories?
<br />
<br />Well, the <a href="http://www.google.com/googleblog/2004/12/polar-expression.html">Google Blog has commented</a> on an element of this "controversy". Apparently, they received an email: <blockquote><em>In reference to holiday illustration #3, I am curious as to how the larger polar bear learned, over a period of a few days, how to roll blobs of snow in almost perfect spheres. I mean, wouldn't this require a few thousand years of mental evolution, not to mention the concept of throwing objects and the idea of guessing how much power to put behind their throw in order for the snowball to land in an acceptable radius of the target...
<br />
<br />...Well, we won't have to worry about this because apparently the larger polar bear got preoccupied with hosing down the O for no apparent or logical reason. And how exactly can this hose have running water if they are in the Arctic tundra? I'll give your illustrator the benefit of the doubt but come on... Unless the polar bears have developed a heating system for their water supply in order to prevent freezing, this wouldn't be possible. And please, don't use the common "well, they stole the hose from the humans which already have heating methods under development." That is such a cliché...
<br />
<br />...Also, considering the size of the polar bear and the circumference of the hose, why would he or she even need help with controlling it? It just seems like the back polar bear is holding up the hose just for the sake of holding up the hose. I mean, these are powerful bears. They can control a small hose with a medium sized jet of water gushing out without requiring the assistance of another bear...
<br />
<br />...And where exactly did they learn that holding the back of the hose stabilizes the front part? I'm assuming there isn't a television anywhere close to them. Did they just somehow, by the luck of the draw, decide to hold the hose in that certain way which is so conveniently similar to the method fire fighters use to stabilize their hoses? One final observation: there are more snowballs in picture number 3 than there are in picture number 2. Where did the extra ones come from and why did the polar bear decide to leave them sitting there if he took the time to neatly organize his previously?</em></blockquote>And their response: <blockquote>Dear User:
<br />
<br />Thank you for your recent email. We appreciate your concern but must confess to considerable bewilderment with regard to various statements you make about the home page doodle of 12/22/04. First, what makes you assert that those are "almost perfect spheres?" If you look more closely, you'll see that the snowballs in question are in fact somewhat oblong, which is to say, wholly producible by a polar bear paw. Second, why would you assume that the polar bear threw the snowballs into that pile, when placing them there would be much easier?
<br />
<br />[regarding the running water in the Arctic] Again with the erroneous assumptions. In this case, you conclude that the presence of a heated hose derives not from nearby humans, but from some technologically advanced and therefore highly unlikely polar bear society, because having humans produce the hose "is such a cliché." Well, life is full of clichés; their prevelance, in fact, is precisely what makes them clichés. As for why the polar bear is hosing down the O: we expect that the past few days have by now made clear that this series of doodles is telling a story whose conclusion none of us have yet to grasp.
<br />
<br />Well, this being a holiday doodle and Google being a family-friendly company, the polar bear story has a family-oriented holiday theme; i.e., the daddy polar bear is spraying down the O as part of a plan to (as you must by now realize) decorate it in a festive manner, and the baby polar bear is "helping."
<br />
<br />Dude, in the interim of time which elapsed between doodle #2 and doodle #3, they made more snowballs, okay? And in the interim of time which elapsed since we began this response, our attitude toward you, dear correspondent, has segued from righteous indignation at your illogical attack on our graphic designer to warm-hearted gratitude that you cared enough to write to us in the first place. We love all our users, especially those who take the time to brighten our day with such graceful, witty emails. Enjoy the rest of Dennis' holiday doodles. Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good night!
<br />
<br />Michael Krantz
<br />Google Blog Team</blockquote>Naturally, this answer was evasive and didn't address the issues present in the melting colors, so I fired off an email: <blockquote>Michael (or whoever answers the Google Blog emails),
<br />
<br />We've been having a confused discussion over at InsideGoogle about Google Doodle IX. While the letter writer makes some excellent points, there is far more confusion about Doodle IX.4. No one seems to understand what in god's name is going on when the hose causes the Google logo to melt and turn the snowballs various colors. What the hell is going on? Did someone at Google have too much eggnog at the office Christmas party?
<br />
<br />Nathan Weinberg
<br />InsideGoogle</blockquote>Jeez, will this ever end (or at least make sense)?
<br />
<br /><b>UPDATE</b>: <a href="http://www.zorgloob.com/2004/12/le-mystre-holiday-doodle.asp">Zorgloob also has</a> the information that the filenames are all Korean, which makes sense since logo creator Dennis Hwang is Korean:
<br />
<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_1.gif">http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_1.gif</a>
<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_dul.gif">http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_dul.gif</a>
<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_sam.gif">http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_sam.gif</a>
<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_sah.gif">http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_sah.gif</a>
<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_o.gif">http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_o.gif</a>
<br />Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103847727875301642004-12-23T19:20:00.000-05:002004-12-23T19:22:07.876-05:00Will Google Buy Community Photo Service?There has been a bit of quiet rumbling lately that we'll see a Google aquisition of community photo service Flickr, or perhaps Fotki early next year. With <a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/20/picasa-20-coming-in-january/">Picasa 2.0 coming</a> (source: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-12-19-goodle-usat_x.htm">USA Today</a>), the word is Google wants the key to the new Picasa's success to be photo sharing, and Flickr/Fotki would be the key. There's a few reasons why this could happen:<ul><li><strong>Orkut</strong> - There's no shortage of people at Google who are dissapointed with the way Orkut is not catching on. Google really wanted to build a powerful community, and it isn't going to happen through Orkut. Buying a popular photo service gives Google that, and a great base to build from.</li><li><strong>Google Images</strong> - Google hasn't updated its image index in many months. Yesterday, when <a href="http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2004/12/22/google-year-end-interactive-zeitgeist/">I posted about the Zeitgeist 2004</a>, I got my images from Yahoo, because Google Images was bare. Google may be holding off updating the index until its finished negotiating with Flickr/Fotki, and then do all at once. Google Images will get more than just eight months worth of crawled images, it'll get the entire database of whoever it buy's users, plus metadata. Sounds like a great press release to me.</li></ul><a href="http://www.bladam.com/archives/0412190006.htm">Adam Lasnik at BLADAM</a> predicts Google will release Picasa 2 on February 15 (very specific... what does he know?), with the Flickr aquisition coming 45 days later. Picking uo Flickr, with fun attitude, small and smart team, open API, "not-evil" history, and considerably large user base (150,000 users and 1.8 million images, <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/fast50_05/profile/?stewart_butterfield718">according to Fast Company</a>) would be a great asset to Google, and repair the fact that none of its community products (Blogger, Groups, Orkut) work very well. This is an area Microsoft is making serious and successful moves in, and Google would do well to not cede this battle to Redmond. I would call it a very smart move.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103815615161290302004-12-23T10:24:00.000-05:002004-12-23T10:26:55.163-05:00Google Doodle IX.4<img src="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_sah.gif" alt="Google Doodle IX.4" />
<br />
<br />I don't get it at all. <a href="http://www.google.com/doodle9.html">Look at the sequence</a>. First the bears are dancing. Then, one makes snowballs while the other builds a snow wall (fort?). Then they use a hose on the Google logo, which presumably freezes it. Now all of a sudden the logo is melting and turning the snowballs different colors? What?Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103814824207908352004-12-23T10:12:00.000-05:002006-11-14T18:14:08.086-05:00Google AdWords Search EngineAre you sick of searching Google and getting actual information? Would you rather just get only paid results, the most relevant ads for your keyword? Well, Search <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/001309.html">Engine Roundtable has noticed</a> the link at the bottom of many ad blocks on Google Search that just says "more". Clicking on it will get you all the ads for that keyword. What does all this translate to? A search engine for Google ads, arranged in a clear order that lets you know which ads Google considers most relevant. It is available via the URL <em>http://www.google.com/sponsoredlinks?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=[query]</em>, replacing [query] with the actual search term. Or, if you're lazy, <a href="http://www.google.com/sponsoredlinks?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&safe=off&c2coff=1&q=fish">click this search for "fish"</a> and then search from the search box at the top of the page. Sure, if this were the regular Google, we'd all be complaining, but by itself it has some good uses.
<br />
<br /><strong>UPDATE</strong> - <a href="http://google-blog.dirson.com/post.new/0216/">Dirson rightly points out</a> that there is a much simpler URL: <a href="http://www.google.com/sponsoredlinks">http://www.google.com/sponsoredlinks</a>.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103769476864325532004-12-22T21:36:00.000-05:002004-12-22T22:03:53.586-05:00John Battelle Predictions For 2005John Battelle did a <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001150.php">very good job</a> with <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/000158.php">his predictions for 2004</a>, and his look ahead for 2005 looks pretty solids as well. Go <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001151.php" target="_blank">read his post in a new windows</a>, and come back here for my thoughts.<ul>#s 1-3 - He's damn right, and you'll see a lot of moves in that arena, including from myself. If got a team of very talented people putting that together right now (be ready to update your bookmarks and RSS feeds).
<br />
<br />#4 - Old media will try, but any strides they make will be through purchases, not innovation. Old media is traditionally terrible at pulling off new technologies on their own, and they view many of these technologies as competition, and attempt to create incompatible "new" things. The urge to monetize will kill many of these efforts, since the vast majority of the internet will refuse any subscription services.
<br />
<br />#5 - I think we'll see Blogger take some pages from MSN Spaces, and design a "Plug-and-Blog" version of Blogger for the vast majority of people. We'll start to see more industry standards as well.
<br />
<br />#6 - Why would they stop?
<br />
<br />#7 - Google needs to diversify its revenue streams, so this has been a given for a while. By this time next year, Froogle and similar non-advertising offerings will make up 10-15% of Google's revenues.
<br />
<br />#8 - I disagree. Microsoft will gain 3-5% of market share as soon as MSN Search Beta goes public. There's no reason a company that has decent market share with horrible search wouldn't gain share when it launches a very good engine. By year's end, Microsoft will be marketted as the search engine that's "just as good as Google" (it won't be, but it'll be close enough for most) but does more for you.
<br />
<br />#9 - Firefox will reach 15% by March, but will not crack 20%. Microsoft will market the AOL browser as the new Internet Explorer, while taking all the lessons AOL learned from making the browser and putting it in an IE update at the end of the year. If MS doesn't release an IE update, it will make sure to put MSN Explorer on as many systems as it can. MSN 10 will have many of the features Firefox has, while being more accessible.
<br />
<br />#10 - Don't be surprised if this is hyped, but never materializes. If it does, it'll be like A9: very interesting, but nowhere near hitting the big time.
<br />
<br />#11 - Search engines will become more like regular companies, dealing with the local issues, just like everybody else. Even capitulating to China is something they'll learn to live with, because if they don't someone else will, and there's plenty of money involved.
<br />
<br />#12 - Yup.
<br />
<br />#13 - Double-yup. And don't be surprised if Yahoo makes a spectular failed bid.
<br />
<br />#14 - Apple will launch a video iPod, or it will lose a lot of market share. Portable video players already exist, and they will start to sell very well. The fight for portable media players will mirror the Palm/Windows CE battles. And Google TV Search is on the way, of course.
<br />
<br />#15 - I have never believed in the market for mobile web. The mobile web will turn into the same thing handhelds turned into: useful for professional, but never as big as the hype made it out to be.
<br />
<br />#16 - I will read John's book, and give it a favorable review, because I have always liked his writing. Unless its a huge departure, in which case we will all discover new synonyms for "suck".
<br />
<br />#17 - John, good luck. I'd love to hear what you have in mind. I'd also love to beat you to it.</ul>What else will happen? Will MSN Search continue to grab headlines and red state net users? Will Google finally open up and reveal what goes on inside its walls? Will blogging conquer its problems with ethics and editing? Will Desktop Search ever live up to the hype? Will Google conquer search spam? Will Google Images ever get updated? Will Slate still exist? Will MSNBC still exist? Will Steve Ballmer start blogging (Bill Gates never will)? Will newspapers ever catch on with younger people?Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103763746267056652004-12-22T19:59:00.000-05:002006-01-08T21:03:47.160-05:00AOL To Offer Free WebmailAOL is beta testing a free webmail service with its members that will soon be made available to the public. The service is called "AOL Mail on the Web" and offers 100 megabytes of storage. <a href="http://news.com.com/AOL+gets+ready+to+launch+free+Web+e-mail/2100-1038_3-5501107.html?part=rss&tag=5501107&subj=news.1038.20">C|Net reports</a> that the service has an advanced interface similar to Outlook (<a href="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne/p/2004/aolmail_500x364.jpg">screenshot</a>), with an address book, advanced message search, and spam control. This is part of AOL's initiative to move services outside the subscriber firewall, and with the upcoming AOL Browser and AOL Desktop Search, 2005 may be the first positive year for AOL in a long time.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103762470710182332004-12-22T19:07:00.000-05:002004-12-22T20:01:41.190-05:00Google Year-End Interactive Zeitgeist<img src="http://blognewschannel.com/images/google/Zeitgest-2004.jpg" alt="Google Interactive Zeitgeist 2004" />
<br />Google has released its <a href="http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html">end of the year Zeitgeist for 2004</a>, highlighting the top searches of the year, and in order to top everyone else's, Google's is interactive, made with Flash. Lots of interesting factoids and trivia bits (one day, you will be able to buy a Google Zeitgeist family game, mark my words), including lots of things you may have forgotten, or wish you had, including:<blockquote><i>The South Beach diet<img src="http://www.fatheadsweb.com/pix/HowardDeanScream.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Howard Dean
<br />Spalding Gray
<br />Janet Jackson @ the Super Bowl
<br />New Zealand and the Lord of the Rings
<br />Martha Stewart
<br />Avian flu
<br />Gay marriage in San Francisco<img src="http://www.onlygoodmovies.net/movies/drama_reviews/drama_art/passion_christ.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />The Passion of the Christ
<br />Kobe Bryant on trial
<br />The Madrid terrorist bombing
<br />Omarosa in The Apprentice
<br />Gmail unveiled<img src="http://www.guru.is/~olikr/gmail.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Pat Tillman
<br />Fantasia Barrino winning American Idol
<br />John Kerry's daughter in a see-through dress
<br />Nick Berg<img src="http://www.youie.com/friends.png" align=Right>
<br />The Friends finale
<br />Smarty Jones<img src="http://reagan2020.com/images/Reagan2x3hat.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Lynndie England and Abu Graib
<br />Ronald Reagan dies
<br />Farenheit 9/11
<br />John Kerry, Barack Obama and the Democratic National Convention
<br />Maria Sharapova!<img src="http://w3.quipo.it/nerogumi/giochi%20e%20schersi/JibJab.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Lance Armstrong - six in a row
<br />JibJab
<br />Swift Boat Veterans for truth
<br />Spider-man 2
<br />The Athens Olympics and Michael Phelps
<br />Google goes public<img src="http://www.politicalstar.com/photos/arnold-schwarzenegger.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Hurricanes in Florida
<br />George W. Bush, Arnold Schwartzenegger, Rudy Giuliani and the Republican National Convention
<br />Rick James dies
<br />Oprah gives away 276 cars<img src="http://www.imusica.com.br/fotos/20030411_art_ray_charles.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Hostage situation ends in disaster in Chechnya
<br />Ray Charles dies
<br />Britney Spears marries
<br />Dan Rather and the National Guard scandal
<br />Christopher Reeve dies<img src="http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_shows/thedailyshowwithjonstewart/images/photos/tds_stewart_01_a3.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Vioxx recalled
<br />SpaceShipOne makes history
<br />John Stewart on Crossfire
<br />The Red Sox win (and the Yankees lose!)
<br />The presidential debates<img src="http://gusalmighty.com/nutrimentia/blog/archives/blogimages/GEORGE%20W%20BUSH.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />Ashlee Simpson "sings" on SNL
<br />Yasser Arafat dies
<br />President Bush reelected
<br />Halo 2, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, and Half-Life 2 released<img src="http://cbs5.com/news/images/people/n-q/peterson_supercu_l.jpg" align=Right height=50>
<br />MSN Search and Toolbar Suite
<br />Scott Peterson sentenced to die
<br />Bernard Kerik
<br />Pregnant mother brutally murdered</i></blockquote>I've added a few things Google left out. Other companies have released a list of their top search keywords:
<br />
<br /><a href="http://hot.aol.com/2004/index.html">America Online</a>
<br /><a href="http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20041220AskJeevesDivulgesTop2004Searches.html">AskJeeves</a>
<br /><a href="http://50.lycos.com/121504.asp">Lycos</a>
<br /><a href="http://tools.search.yahoo.com/top2004/">Yahoo</a>Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103710162050330282004-12-22T05:05:00.000-05:002004-12-22T05:09:22.050-05:00Google Doodle IX.3<img src="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_sam.gif" />
<br />
<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/doodle9.html">Just what are those bears up to?</a>Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103707101695041972004-12-22T04:16:00.000-05:002004-12-22T04:18:21.696-05:00The Future: Journalism Is Dead<img src="http://blognewschannel.com/images/google/Googlezon.jpg">
<br />
<br /><a href="http://www.robinsloan.com/epic/">This Flash video is just unbelievable</a>. I love it and hate it at the same time. EPIC 2014, by Robin Sloan, chronicles what will happen over the next four years, as companies like Google tear down all notions of information and news media, destroying traditional media institutions and giving every user access to information that is as personalized and communal as it is sensational and devoid of ethics. I agree that, the way things are going, traditional media will be destroyed by the internet. However, I believe that a new form of media can be created on the internet, one that leverages citizen journalism with old media rules of ethics and organization. You'll see more of what I mean over the next few weeks. Is traditional media dying? Yes, but that doesn't mean that the news has to die as well.
<br />(via <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/alexbarn/archive/2004/12/21/328937.aspx">Alex Barnett</a>)Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103693453882299632004-12-22T00:30:00.000-05:002004-12-22T00:30:53.883-05:00Email Firm Pimps Gmail For PublicityIncrediMail is proud to announce that Gmail users can access their Gmail through IncrediMain by POP3 access... just like every email provider on the planet. Taking a play from the <a href="http://insidegoogle.blogspot.com/2004/11/in-news-company-achieves-high-google.html">Stupid</a> <a href="http://insidegoogle.blogspot.com/2004/11/more-stupid-pagerank-articles.html">Google</a> <a href="http://insidegoogle.blogspot.com/2004/11/stupid-pagerank-articles-part-3.html">Press</a> <a href="http://insidegoogle.blogspot.com/2004/11/oh-how-i-love-thee-la-times.html">Release</a> file, IncrediMail figures it'll get free publiciy by adding something like four lines of code to its email program to make it so Gmail users only have to enter a username and password to get POP3 through their program. Well, just like with the PageRank releases, I'm sure it'll work out just fine. I should release a press release, too.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103658471921369602004-12-21T14:47:00.000-05:002006-01-13T15:42:37.866-05:00Too Many Google Ads?<a href="http://google.weblogsinc.com/entry/1234000483024412/">The Unofficial Google Weblog asks</a> "Why so many ads, Google?" I've noticed that on some very popular searches, Google displays as many ads as the page will fit. I searched for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=domain+registration">domain registration</a>, and even though I ask for 100 results per page, Google managed to have ads the whole way down. Same thing Brad Hill discovered on a search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mps+players">MP3 players</a>. Are people okay with this? It doesn't seem that way all the time, but often enough to be noticed.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103653128105013852004-12-21T13:18:00.000-05:002004-12-21T13:18:48.106-05:00GoogleBot: Interview<IMG src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v331/montevino/Googlebot-Bender.jpg" align=right>Phillip Lensen has scored a major scoop, an <A href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2004_12_21_index.html#110362560765313742">interview with the ever elusive GoogleBot</A>. GB paints a tragic, haunting figure, laid-back, carefree, aware of his own mortality, but unconcerned. Truly, the saddest thing I've read all day. But whatever. He's lazy. "I don't do ranking"? Get off your college-educated pot-smoking good-for-nothing butt and do some real work! Sheesh!Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103693007632945582004-12-21T10:37:00.000-05:002004-12-22T00:23:27.633-05:00New Worm Uses Google, Just Like Everybody ElseThe Net-Worm.Perl.Santy.a <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=55801429">worm uses Google to find websites</a> running vulnerable versions of phpBB, and then defaces their homepages.<blockquote><i>"This is a little hint of what's coming in 2005," cautions Timothy Keanini, chief technology officer for nCircle Network Security Inc., a network security company. "All the technology that makes us more efficient makes the bad guys more efficient, too."</i></blockquote>You have to believe on some level, someone at Google is thinking, "Yeah, they used our search engine. Not Yahoo, not MSN, not Jeeves. Us. Because we're the most eficient way to find anything." Still, Google must use its powers only for good.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103620255329070932004-12-21T04:10:00.000-05:002004-12-21T04:10:55.330-05:00Google Doodle IX.2<img src="http://www.google.com/logos/winter_holiday_04_dul.gif" />
<br />Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103599119606152332004-12-20T22:18:00.000-05:002004-12-20T22:18:39.606-05:00Search Engine Forums Blow Things Out Of Proportion<a href="http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20041220GoogleRumoredToLimitAdwordsToOneAdPerPage.html">Rich Ord explains at WebProNews</a> how a rumor spread through <a href="http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=3092">Search Engine Watch forums</a>, <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum81/3886-2-10.htm">Webmasterworld</a>, and eventually <a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2004/12/20/affiliates_fear_google_may_move_to_one_ad_per_page/">MarketingVox</a> that Google was going to limit ads to only one per page. Obviously, that would have been a revenue damaging move, and the rumor was a misunderstanding of the new policy on affiliate ads. Still, another example of why I don't report on message board rumors.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103593923015730762004-12-20T20:51:00.000-05:002004-12-20T20:52:03.016-05:00Google Deskbar Plugins<a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2004_12_20_index.html#110357558111102575">Google Blogoscoped points out</a> the <a href="http://www.gdeskbar.co.nr/">GDeskbar site</a>, filled with plugins for the Google Deskbar. The site has:<ul><li> <b>Foodle</b> - Search Feedster, A9, Technorati, others. </li><li> <b>Net Send</b> - Send a net send message direct from the Deskbar. </li><li> <b>GoogPlug v1.2</b> - Use various free web services to obtain information, including the command line, real-world distances, random bible verses, most Google services (GDS, Gmail, etc.), and much more. Also has the ability to save favorite scripts for quick access. </li><li> <b>CHM</b> - Search CHM (help) files. </li><li> <b>Xlsgen</b> - Search Excel files. </li><li> <b>Gmail</b> - Search Gmail. </li><li> <b>Local</b> - Search Google Local. </li></ul>Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103589727234397732004-12-20T19:41:00.000-05:002004-12-20T19:42:07.233-05:00Picasa 2.0 Coming In January<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004-12-19-goodle-usat_x.htm">USA Today has a story</a> on what Google 2005 will bring. Included in the tidbits is this:<blockquote><i>A new, greatly enhanced — and still free — version of Picasa will be released in January.</i></blockquote>Google also plans expansions of Orkut and Keyhole and their anathema to ever being a portal. Also, analyst Mark Mahaney continues to speak of gloom and doom for the stock, since the company's lack of disclosure presents serious risks.Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103588946407198532004-12-20T19:25:00.000-05:002004-12-20T22:09:58.226-05:00Compare All The Desktop Search Tools<a href="http://www.goebelgroup.com/">Goebel Group</a> has put together a handy matrix to <a href="http://www.goebelgroup.com/desktopmatrix.htm">compare all the major free desktop search systems</a>. It looks at <blockquote><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:85%;">Autonomy Beta 1.7
<br />Ask Jeeves Desktop Search
<br />Blinkx
<br />Copernic
<br />DT Search
<br />Google Desktop Search
<br />ISYS:desktop
<br />MSN Toolbar Suite
<br />X1 </blockquote></span>and compares them on: <blockquote><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:85%;">Download size
<br />Operating System
<br />System Requirements
<br />File types
<br />Email
<br />Audio
<br />Video
<br />Images
<br />Browser Supported
<br />Deskbar
<br />Content Integration
<br />Enterprise Integration
<br />Security
<br />Languages</blockquote></span>(via <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/041220-112740">Search Engine Watch</a>)
<br />Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103587990938139242004-12-20T19:12:00.000-05:002004-12-20T22:22:52.400-05:00Google Loses Top Executive<img src="http://www.google.com/corporate/images/management/cindy.jpg" align="right" /><a href="http://www.google.com/corporate/execs.html#cindy">Cindy McCaffrey</a>, Google's Vice President of Corporate Marketing and with the company practically since the beginning, has announced she's leaving. McCaffrey is in many ways responsible for Google's low-key ad strategy that has relied more on word-of-mouth than anything else, <a href="http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2004/12/19/mccaffrey_leaving_google.html">according to SiliconBeat</a>. Because she's been around so long, she can retire on the millions she likely made in the IPO, a great capper to a 20-year career in the P.R. business, which she pursued after a shorter career as a reporter. <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/041220-123734">Danny Sullivan calls her</a> one of Google's "secret weapons". <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001144.php">John Battelle also reminisces</a>, giving Cindy credit for "the most unprecedented run of good press in modern corporate history".
<br /><span style="font-size:-2;">Hey Google, you looking to hire any reporters?</span>
<br />Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103580769286618372004-12-20T17:12:00.000-05:002004-12-20T17:12:49.286-05:00Celebrex Soars, At Least In Ad Dollars<img src="http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2004/12/17/image661690l.jpg" align="Right">Celebrex, the keyword, has soared, as personal injury attorneys scramble to buy the keyword for big bucks at Overture and AdWords, <a href="http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid={DE0045EE-701F-48D5-9F2E-B0ED1345E646}&siteid=mktw&dist=nbs">MarketWatch is reporting</a>. The Overture cost of Celebrex soared from 95 cents on Friday to $4.02 today, following news that the FDA was considering regulatory measures for the best-selling arthritis drug. Celebrex is expected to top ten dollars, but not reach the heights of Vioxx, which reched $40 per click within two weeks of its withdrawl from the market. Vioxx still sells at about $9.
<br />(via <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/041220-132423">Search Engine Watch</a>)Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8146811.post-1103580252202346322004-12-20T17:04:00.000-05:002004-12-20T17:04:12.203-05:00The Google Story<a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/041220-142402">Search Engine Watch's Gary Price posts</a> that Pulitzer Prize–winning Washington Post reporter David Vise has signed a book deal for <i>The Google Story</i>, a "a chronological narrative that also embraces the populist style of the company, its technological expertise and the challenges success has brought". Expect more similar announcements, as Google remains "hot". The abstract from <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA488838.html?pubdate=12%2F20%2F2004&display=current">the PublishersWeekly story</a> (evil subscription hides the rest):<blockquote>Pulitzer Prize–winning <EM>Washington Post</EM> business reporter David Vise has signed with Ann Harrisat Bantam Dell to write <EM>The Google Story</EM>, which traces the search engine from its founding by a pair of graduate students in 1998 to its global reach and multibillion-dollar revenues today.</blockquote>Nathan Weinberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06198683419603404895noreply@blogger.com0